[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Touch sensors (placement of)

To: Cindy Wong <wongci@ecf.utoronto.ca>
Subject: Re: Touch sensors (placement of)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:19:09 -0500
Cc: poonj@ecf.toronto.edu, vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu
Delivered-to: hoek@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000130233255.20685L-100000@spark29.ecf>; from Cindy Wong on Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 11:34:48PM -0500
References: <Pine.SGI.3.96.1000130214203.45476367A-100000@skule.ecf> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000130233255.20685L-100000@spark29.ecf>
Sender: hoek@FreeBSD.org

On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Cindy Wong wrote:
> 
> I see what Tim is saying, but I have to agree with Joyce.  Besides, at the
> side, the wheels are there and there really is no room for sensors anyway.

Well, in that case it's even easier to limit ourselves to eight touch
sensors.

The original drawing Joyce and I made on Jan 9 (see email: "Dear
Cindy") called for 10 sensors, but it did so on the assumption that
they would be equally spaced around the perimeter of the robot.

-- 
Signature withheld by request of author.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Touch sensors (placement of)
  - From: Cindy Wong <wongci@ecf.utoronto.ca>

References:
- Re: Touch sensors (placement of)
  - From: Joyce Poon <poonj@ecf.utoronto.ca>
- Re: Touch sensors (placement of)
  - From: Cindy Wong <wongci@ecf.utoronto.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Wheel-speed opto-couples
Next by Date: TAs and DesignWeb
Previous by thread: Re: Touch sensors (placement of)
Next by thread: Re: Touch sensors (placement of)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread