[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OP505s
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
> I may have damaged the 6522 chip, though. I'm still waiting for
> Malone to confirm hardware modifications I proposed that should make
> the 6522 interrupts work with the monitor program (they normally
> damage 6522 chips without the modification I proposed).
Oh yeah, I forgot to tell you that Active Surplus does not have any 6522.
I asked last time I went there.
> I also have 8 new rolls of extra-strong King peppermints, if you want
> any. ;-)
No thank you.
> I'd like to have a chat with you sometime during the weekend. Not to
> talk design. :) Just for lunch. I have to bitch about this new Marriot
> manager --- she was up to her usual tricks this supper... The rest of
> the folks in my house are getting tired of me complain about her. :)
I dunno if I'll be around much. I might be heading home later. There are
things at home that I must tend to.
> Oh, Joyce, you're no fun! I don't think you appreciate how devilish I
> can be, yet. :) :) :) You will, you will.... :-) :-)
>
> I have a feeling you're right about both of them evaluating, though.
Nooooooooooooooooo.
Joyce :)
PS I believe that I'm quite done with all the circuitry. However, the
range of the IR sensor is rather pathetic @ circa 3ft (I tested in the
dark with 2 OP505s). I think I might try changing the cap on the IR
emitter so that it emits at a higher frequency. Maybe 2kHz is too close
to the cutoff frequency of circa 1kHz. But I think I'll do that on Mon.
- References:
- Re: OP505s
- From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>