[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reflected Signal Problem
[I haven't read this whole thread yet, but I'm going to make a short
comment, anyways].
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Joyce Poon wrote:
>
> The problem that Cindy described is neglects the fact that we may be
> picking up the signal emitted by the enemy beacon as well. It will be all
> good if we can just read 1 signal... but the question now is... whose
I think we can assume for the most part that we will read only our own
signal. Our signal is keyed to a certain frequency. If we're really
concerned that intentional interference will be a problem, we can do
something fancy (say amplitude + frequency modulation, or perhaps
modulated frequency modulation), although that would probably require
some rather tricky electronics or a microcontroller or pal on the
beacon (and Malone would probably discourage us from doing such a
thing).
>From what I understand "interference" may be a problem, but not
necessarily intentional interference.
[qouted "interference" because I wonder how many groups blame
"interference" when they should blame their own poorly built
circuits...]
--
Signature withheld by request of author.