[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dear Cindy (or: "While you were away...")
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 08:58:11PM -0500, Joyce Poon wrote:
>
> This message only concerns Tim.
Okay, fwiw, the following were discussed/decided
1) 8 appears to be the most likely number of IR sensors that will be
mounted on our robot. 11 is ideal but more electrically touchy.
Joyce has a spreadsheet that calculates the blindspot for a
given number of IR sensors. There will be a considerable number
of wires attached.
WRT IR sensors we considered a number of non-conventional
techniques but appear to have ultimately settled for the conventional.
This is somewhat disappointing, of course...
[*]
2) 10 appears to be a decent number of touch sensors around the
robot's perimeter. The question of quality vs. quantity was raised
but was not answered.
3) Radio sensors are on hold for the moment. By the time we got to
them, both Joyce and I were quite tired of this game. :-) The
general agreement is that some additional relay mechanism will
eventually be found. We just haven't figured-out what, yet.
Along with radio sensors, dropped beacons also go on hold. Don't rule
them out of the design, yet, however.
4) A review of past tag player robots reminded us of the following
maxim: SPEED and ACCELERATION!! Actually, I don't think that
technically qualifies as a maxim, but the point stands. :)
Any comments appreciated.
See you at 1:00, Cindy.
> really soon... I'm going to stay online for awhile to check out the chip
> site. If I'm on skule, pls email or talk/write to me. Otherwise, give me
And the chip site is useless. It does not list the op505. <grumble>
[*] Joyce: It occured to me now that once we have working IR detectors
and transmitters, we can hook the detectors up to a 'scope and see
what kind of a signal we actually get from the things. We may
re-evaluate some of our decisions in that light (no pun intended ;).
--
Signature withheld by request of author.